Next post
Previous post
Home
Master Archives
Monthly Archives
Individual Archives
RSS 2.0 feed
Atom feed
Recent Entries
• I totally should have watched Wayne's World before going to NYC
• On loving an obscure band in the age of an evolved Internet
• Crosswords are more fun when they can be filled in with wishful thinking
• We're not gonna take it
• Finally, proof that I didn't marry a toddler
• From the point of view of the chronically healthy
• Shudder To Think at the Bowery Ballroom (I was there!)
• Can't hardly wait
• I Shudder To Think what would happen if I missed this opportunity
• Wine + knitting = nothing can possibly go wrong here
Recent Comments
Sabrina on We're not gonna take it
Jitterbean Girl on We're not gonna take it
Marissa on We're not gonna take it
View my comment policy
People I Know
Escapades of Reason
A Little Bit of Suburbia...
Maelstrom Cognizance
Man on the Moon
Matt in Japan
mrtl
Polymorphous
Proverbs of the Arctic Fox
Ryan's World
101 Cookbooks
Bittersweet Life
Blurbomat
Cumin and Coriander
Daily Dose of Imagery
The Dancing Fool
Dave's Alaska Pics
dooce
Gripe Du Jour
Pinch My Salt
prete.ntio.us
Sugarlaw
Smitten Kitchen
Snazzykat
This Fish Needs a Bicycle
A Year in Bread
Alaska Grown
Astronomy Picture of the Day
Cook's Illustrated
Dinosaur Comics
Giant Microbes
Gmail
Kaladi Brothers Coffee
Life Is Good
Moose's Tooth Pub & Pizzeria
National Geographic
NPR
Powell's Books
The Prime Number Shitting Bear
Scharffen Berger Chocolate
Snow City Cafe
STOP Puppy Mills
Spamusement!
USA Today Crossword
stacey . smoore . the staceyfish . mathematician . swimmer . photographer . foodie . knitter . intj . moderate liberal . displaced alaskan . doggie lover . agnostic pantheist unitarian universalist . birkenstocks . tom robbins . shudder to think . cappuccino . green eyed . introverted . loved
My photoblog - Lens: The adventures of a girl and her camera
Magnifico! The culinary exploits of a foodie and her camera
Currently Reading
Even Cowgirls Get the Blues by Tom Robbins
Most Recently Completed
God Is Not Great by Christopher Hitchens
Stalking Irish Madness by Patrick Tracey
In the Queue
Love in the Time of Cholera by Gabriel Garcia Marquez
Favorite Reads
Jitterbug Perfume and Fierce Invalids Home From Hot Climates (my two favorite books of all time) by Tom Robbins
In the Skin of a Lion by Michael Ondaatje
The Harry Potter series by J.K. Rowling
Contact and Pale Blue Dot by Carl Sagan
Cryptonomicon and The Baroque Cycle by Neal Stephenson
Lord of the Rings by J.R.R. Tolkien
On the Needles
Technical bits
This site is crafted with valid CSS and valid HTML and is powered by Moveable Type 4.31-en.

Best viewed in a fully CSS-compliant browser like Mozilla Firefox. Viewing in any version of Internet Explorer is not recommended.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License. This means: please don't steal my stuff. I've seen people take some of my works without permission, change them, and not give me credit. It makes me sad. Don't make me sad.
We're not gonna take it - posted at 11:27
Ok, knitting designers, we need to talk. Seriously.
We have a wonderful craft at our finger (needle?) tips. It is infinitely flexible, our creativity limited by only a few things, such as our ability to fund our stashes (but that's about it). We have the ability to make rectangles or tubes, or even a rectangle and a tube, all in one piece! We are not constrained the way many other fabric-based crafts are - we can create shaping and curves and make prettymuch whatever the bloody hell we want to. We have the power to make entire garments without sewing a single stitch.
Then why, why, WHY do you insist on writing patterns that are made flat and then sewn together??? I thought the WHOLE POINT of being able to make tubes is to avoid sewing things up! There is absolutely no reason to do it.
Why why WHY do you make patterns from the bottom up, making it impossible to try on for fit as you go??? This has got to be the biggest blunder ever in the knitting world. Again, this marvelous craft gives us many gifts, and one of them is the ability to custom-fit garments as we make them! Why why WHY do you eschew this gift??? Making things flat from the bottom up is TOXIC. How is it any different from buying something off the rack at a department store? All you've done is essentially made something that you had very little power to custom-make to your measurements to insure the fit you want.
Take the sleeve, for example. If I make a sleeve to go on a sweater the way that 95% of the available patterns do, then I'm going to start at the wrist, knit flat (thus inviting in the Dread Pirate Purling) and go up to the shoulder. Two problems: What if it's too short? Then I'm hosed. I have to unravel the entire bloody sleeve to add in extra inches. Secondly, last time I checked, an ARM is ROUND - why not knit the sleeve in the round??? Why bring in the extra work of purling and then seaming???
Knitting publishers, you are missing a huge market by favoring "traditionally" (aka convoluted) constructed garments. You are alienating Process Knitters who hate purling, who hate seaming. You are jettisoning the best parts of our craft by taking away the power to easily try on as we go and forgoing the ability to easily add or subtract length from a garment. It may take a tad bit more study to learn how to knit these garments, but isn't it worth it???
Designers like Barbara Walker, Wendy Bernard, Stephanie Japel, and Diane Soucy, I salute you! You have put the full power of knitting back into our hands and onto our needles and enabled us to knit like the craft originally intended!
And knitters, it's time to take back our craft. Let designers and publishers know that we are knitters, not seamstresses! Tell them that we embrace a challenge and want to learn new construction methods! Yell from the mountaintops that we are no longer going to cripple our craft or eschew the best that the yarn and needles have to offer! And if we all yell loudly enough, perhaps, just perhaps, they'll hear us and we can affect our own Knitter's Revolution and we can get back to the best of the heart that the needles offer us.
Marissa commented:
I made *one* sweater flat. And the back was about 3 inches longer than the front. I frogged the whole thing, tossed the DK yarn back into my stash, and haven't touched it since.
Jitterbean Girl commented:
I think we all have similar I-knit-a-sweater-flat horror stories. The one that I knit flat was a total disaster and I would have frogged it but it had taken me three months to make and it was a birthday present for my Mom, so she was under contract to like it. That's the nice thing about Moms - she'll understand that it is a token of love, even if it's ugly. I'm just thankful that there are more and more in-the-round sweater patterns available and that books like Custom Knits are out there so that I can re-write stubborn flat patterns.
Sabrina commented:
I hear that. I love knitting (I don't even mind purling) but I HATE finishing with a passion. Two years ago I knit a hoodie for my niece. It's still in 6 pieces because I hate seaming with the fire of a thousand suns. If I wanted to sew crap together, I'd learn to sew.
Seaming is the devil!